An Overt Disclosure Requirement for Eliminating the Fiduciary Duty of Loyalty

Transactions: The Tennessee Journal of Business Law, Vol. 20, pp. 979-92, 2019

14 Pages Posted: 21 Nov 2019

See all articles by Joshua P. Fershee

Joshua P. Fershee

University of North Dakota - School of Law; West Virginia University - College of Law; Dean & Professor of Law

Date Written: October 10, 2019

Abstract

This essay focuses on the concept of eliminating the fiduciary duty in an LLC, as permitted by Delaware law, and what that could mean for future parties. When parties A and B get together to create an LLC, it is okay if they negotiate to eliminate their fiduciary agreements as to one another. They are negotiating for what they want; they are entering into that entity and operating agreement together of their own free will. Although there may be differences in bargaining power—one may be wealthier than the other or have different kinds of power dynamics—they are entering into this agreement fully aware of what the obligations are and what the options are for somebody in creating this entity.

However, there is a concern with eliminating fiduciary obligations down the road. That is, how do we make sure that if people are going to disclaim the fiduciary duty of loyalty, particularly, what happens if this change is made after formation? In such a case, traditional partnership law says there are certain kinds of decisions, at least absent an agreement to the contrary, that must to go to the entire group of entity participants. That is, a majority vote is not sufficient; there is essentially a minority veto.

This essay supports the freedom of contract that the elimination of fiduciary duties provides, but also acknowledges the risks such eliminations can provide. Thus, the essay argues that Delaware (and other states allowing reduction or elimination of the duty of loyalty) should require an express statement about LLC fiduciary duties (when modified from the default) and an express statement of how those duties can be modified, whether expanding, restricting, or eliminating the duties. To protect against the predatory modification of fiduciary duties, states should include a statutory requirement that changes to fiduciary duties must be express as should the rules for modifying such duties. This essay also provides sample statutory language to that end.

Keywords: LLC, fiduciary, duty, duty of loyalty, limited liability company, partnership

JEL Classification: M1, M10, M13, M14,

Suggested Citation

Fershee, Joshua Paul and Fershee, Joshua Paul and Fershee, Joshua Paul, An Overt Disclosure Requirement for Eliminating the Fiduciary Duty of Loyalty (October 10, 2019). Transactions: The Tennessee Journal of Business Law, Vol. 20, pp. 979-92, 2019, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3484591

Joshua Paul Fershee (Contact Author)

University of North Dakota - School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 9003
Grand Forks, ND 58202-9003
United States
701-777-2261 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://law.und.edu/faculty/profile/fershee-j.cfm

Dean & Professor of Law ( email )

2500 California Plaza
Omaha, NE 68178
United States
402-280-2348 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.creighton.edu/faculty-directory-profile/2522/joshua-fershee

West Virginia University - College of Law ( email )

101 Law School Drive
Morgantown, WV West Virginia 26506
United States
304-293-2868 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://law.wvu.edu/faculty/full_time_faculty/joshua-p-fershee

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
52
Abstract Views
594
rank
504,187
PlumX Metrics