Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Gail Heriot in In the Name of Hate: Examining the Federal Government's Role in Responding to Hate Crimes, a Report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights

22 Pages Posted: 13 Nov 2019

See all articles by Gail L. Heriot

Gail L. Heriot

American Civil Rights Project; U.S. Commission on Civil Rights; Manhattan Institute

Date Written: 2019

Abstract

On November 13, 2019, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights released a report entitled In the Name of Hate: Examining the Federal Government’s Role in Responding to Hate Crimes. This Commissioner Statement is part of that report.

The Statement discusses the problems of (1) hate crime hoaxes; (2) overbroad definitions of hate crimes; and (3) double jeopardy issues raised when the federal government seeks to re-prosecute under the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act a defendant who has already been acquitted in state court.

Keywords: Hate crimes, hoaxes, double jeopardy, Commission on Civil Rights, Southern Poverty Law Center, Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act

JEL Classification: K00, K10

Suggested Citation

Heriot, Gail L., Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Gail Heriot in In the Name of Hate: Examining the Federal Government's Role in Responding to Hate Crimes, a Report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (2019). San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 19-422, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3485077 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3485077

Gail L. Heriot (Contact Author)

American Civil Rights Project ( email )

P.O. Box 12207
Dallas, TX 75225
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.americancivilrightsproject.org/

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights

1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Suite 1150
Washington, DC 20425

Manhattan Institute ( email )

52 Vanderbilt Avenue
New York, NY 10017
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,098
Abstract Views
13,207
Rank
34,694
PlumX Metrics