What Works and for Whom: A Review of OECD Countries' Experiences with Active Labour Market Policies
Swedish Economic Policy Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, Fall 2001, pp. 9-56.
54 Pages Posted: 9 Nov 2002
Abstract
This paper first reviews trends since 1985 in public spending on labour market programmes, both active and passive. It then reviews the main findings from recent evaluations of labour market programmes. At first sight evaluation findings are not very encouraging, but there are some success stories. Counselling and job-search assistance appear to be particularly cost-effective; significant impacts are often estimated for self-employment programmes, although these are appropriate for only a limited proportion of the unemployed; and hiring subsidies help their participants, although they suffer increasingly from dead-weight and substitution effects as they are expanded. At the same time, an evaluation focus on the post-programme impacts of active measures tells only part of the story. 'Motivation' effects on individuals that do not participate in programmes can be significant. Regular public employment service (PES) interventions such as job-search monitoring, intensive interviews, and referrals to vacant jobs are not often rigourously evaluated. Activation strategies which combine high-quality help with finding work and pressure on unemployed people to accept job offers tend to achieve more rapid returns to work, although this sometimes comes at the cost of lower re-employment earnings. The paper highlights the importance of good PES management and describes some novel attempts at improving its effectiveness through performance measurement and quasi-competitive mechanisms. Although active policies might give rise to displacement effects in the short run, this need not be case over the medium run of a few years: declines in structural unemployment rates achieved by many OECD countries in the 1990s give some reasons for optimism in this respect.
Keywords: Job search, wage subsidues, labour market training
JEL Classification: J38, J64, J68
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data
By James J. Heckman, Hidehiko Ichimura, ...
-
Propensity Score Matching Methods for Non-Experimental Causal Studies
By Rajeev H. Dehejia and Sadek Wahba
-
Propensity Score Matching Methods for Non-Experimental Causal Studies
By Rajeev H. Dehejia and Sadek Wahba
-
Using the Longitudinal Structure of Earnings to Estimate the Effect of Training Programs
By Orley Ashenfelter and David Card
-
Causal Effects in Non-Experimental Studies: Re-Evaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs
By Rajeev H. Dehejia and Sadek Wahba
-
Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Under Exogeneity: A Review
-
The Role of the Propensity Score in Estimating Dose-Response Functions
-
Does Matching Overcome Lalonde's Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators?
By Jeffrey A. Smith and Petra Todd