Structural Injunctions and Public Interest Litigation in India

Chintan Chandrachud, 'Structural Injunctions and Public Interest Litigation in India' in P J Yap, Constitutional Remedies in Asia (Routledge 2019)

17 Pages Posted: 29 Dec 2019

See all articles by Chintan Chandrachud

Chintan Chandrachud

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP

Date Written: May 7, 2019

Abstract

It is now generally accepted – both by commentators on the Indian Supreme Court and by the Court itself – that the Court’s public interest litigation docket is best analysed in three phases. In the first, the Court protects the poor and marginalised; in the second, the Court considers matters on the environment and sustainable development; and in the third, the Court turns its attention to governance and transparency in administration. The Court’s use of structural injunctions to manage litigation is a common thread that runs through these phases. This Chapter will analyse the Court’s use of structural injunctions across the three phases, and in particular, the continuities in how, why and when the Court decides to deploy these injunctions. The Chapter will do so by focussing in close detail on the Court’s orders in the salient cases of each of these three phases.

Keywords: Indian constitution, structural injunctions, public interest litigation, constitutional remedies

Suggested Citation

Chandrachud, Chintan, Structural Injunctions and Public Interest Litigation in India (May 7, 2019). Chintan Chandrachud, 'Structural Injunctions and Public Interest Litigation in India' in P J Yap, Constitutional Remedies in Asia (Routledge 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3488309

Chintan Chandrachud (Contact Author)

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP ( email )

One Fleet Place
London, EC4M 7RA
United Kingdom
WC1V 6LJ (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
53
Abstract Views
217
rank
397,448
PlumX Metrics