The Consumer Welfare Controversy

CPI Antitrust Chronical, Nov. 2019, at 22

Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 19-27

8 Pages Posted: 20 Nov 2019

Date Written: November 17, 2019


“Consumer welfare” (“CW”) is the stated goal of antitrust law. Among the cognoscenti, the CW standard is a proxy for the transformation of antitrust law over the past four decades and Robert Bork’s deep imprint on antitrust law. In recent years, calls to abandon the CW standard and replace it with an array of fairness values gained traction. This paper summarizes the key findings and conclusions of my study of the CW controversy. The CW standard, I argue, has failed to protect competition effectively because it has multiple meanings and its applications are guided by erroneous premises. These problems should be addressed. The goal of antitrust law, I argue, should align with antitrust’s core task: protecting the competitive process by banning business agreements, practices, and transactions whose adverse effects on trading opportunities unreasonably impair the process.

Keywords: antitrust, competition policy, consumer welfare

Suggested Citation

Orbach, Barak, The Consumer Welfare Controversy (November 17, 2019). CPI Antitrust Chronical, Nov. 2019, at 22, Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 19-27, Available at SSRN:

Barak Orbach (Contact Author)

University of Arizona ( email )

1201 E. Speedway Blvd.
Tuscon, AZ 85721-0176
United States
520-626-7256 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics