Age, Equality, and Vulnerability

21 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 161 (2020)

26 Pages Posted: 3 Dec 2019 Last revised: 30 Jan 2020

See all articles by Alexander A. Boni-Saenz

Alexander A. Boni-Saenz

University of Minnesota Law School; Chicago-Kent College of Law

Date Written: 2020

Abstract

This Article uses age as an entry point for examining how temporal and methodological issues in egalitarianism make substantive equality an unattractive goal for vulnerability theory. Instead, vulnerability theory should adopt a continuous doctrine of sufficiency, which is a better fit with vulnerability theory’s underlying aims and rhetoric. Instead of evaluating what individuals have in relation to others, sufficiency refocuses the inquiry on whether we have enough throughout the lifecourse. In the context of vulnerability theory, enough should be defined as the capability to be resilient as guaranteed by the responsive state.

Keywords: age, capability, discrimination, equality, resilience, sufficiency, time, vulnerability

Suggested Citation

Boni-Saenz, Alexander Antonio, Age, Equality, and Vulnerability (2020). 21 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 161 (2020), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3490254 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3490254

Alexander Antonio Boni-Saenz (Contact Author)

University of Minnesota Law School ( email )

United States

Chicago-Kent College of Law ( email )

565 W. Adams St.
Chicago, IL 60661-3691
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
152
Abstract Views
1,038
Rank
351,918
PlumX Metrics