Utilitarianism and Horizontal Equity: The Case for Random Taxation
56 Pages Posted: 18 Aug 2004 Last revised: 26 Nov 2022
Date Written: June 1981
Abstract
This paper establishes that, far from being able to derive the principle of horizontal equity from utilitarianism, the principle is actually in- consistent with utilitarianism in a variety of circumstances. We derive conditions under which (a) it is optimal to impose random tax schedules (ex post randomization) ; and (b) it is optimal to randomize the tax schedules imposed on a set of otherwise identical individuals (ex ante randomization). The implications for optimal tax theory are discussed. More generally, it is shown that there are a number of potentially important economic situations with which the principle of horizontal equity may be inconsistent not only with utilitarianism but even with Pareto optimality.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Horizontal Equity: Measures in Search of a Principle
By Louis Kaplow
-
A New Measure of Horizontal Equity
By Alan J. Auerbach and Kevin A. Hassett
-
An Atkinson-Gini Family of Social Evaluation Functions
By Jean-yves Duclos and Abdelkrim Araar
-
A Fundamental Objection to Tax Equity Norms: A Call for Utilitarianism
By Louis Kaplow
-
A Fundamental Objection to Tax Equity Norms: A Call for Utilitarianism
By Louis Kaplow
-
Horizontal Equity: New Measures, Unclear Principles
By Louis Kaplow
-
Horizontal Equity: New Measures, Unclear Principles
By Louis Kaplow
-
A Normative and Statistical Approach to Measuring Classical Horizontal Inequity
By Jean-yves Duclos and Peter J. Lambert
-
A Normative Approach to Measuring Classical Horizontal Inequity
By Jean-yves Duclos and Peter J. Lambert