Partisanship and Public Opinion on Cash Transfers: Survey Evidence From Kenya

45 Pages Posted: 16 Dec 2019 Last revised: 7 Jun 2021

See all articles by Ken Ochieng' Opalo

Ken Ochieng' Opalo

Georgetown University; Center for Global Development

Date Written: November 30, 2019

Abstract

Existing research finds significant partisan differences in public opinion on the causes of poverty, deservingness of government assistance, and support for government spending on social protection. However, much of the evidence comes from middle-to-high-income countries with established social welfare programs. With material evidence from Kenya, this paper interrogates how partisanship conditions public opinion on the causes of poverty, deservingness of assistance, and how cash transfer programs ought to be financed. I find minimal partisan differences in perceptions of the causes of poverty and deservingness, but significant differences in opinions about how cash transfers ought to be financed. In particular, supporters of the incumbent president are more likely to support increasing taxes to finance these programs compared to opposition supporters. These findings suggest that partisan differences about social spending may exist even in contexts where there are no significant differences on the causes of poverty and deservingness.

Keywords: Distributive Politics, Social Protection, Cash Transfers, Africa, Kenya

Suggested Citation

Opalo, Ken Ochieng', Partisanship and Public Opinion on Cash Transfers: Survey Evidence From Kenya (November 30, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3495915 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3495915

Ken Ochieng' Opalo (Contact Author)

Georgetown University ( email )

Washington, DC 20057
United States

Center for Global Development ( email )

2055 L St. NW
5th floor
Washington, DC 20036
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
89
Abstract Views
717
rank
351,756
PlumX Metrics