'Quid', Not 'Quantum': A Comment on 'How the International Criminal Court Threatens Treaty Norms'

(2016) 49 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 433–441

9 Pages Posted: 3 Dec 2019 Last revised: 14 Dec 2019

See all articles by Roger O'Keefe

Roger O'Keefe

Bocconi University - Department of Law

Date Written: 2016

Abstract

The article comments on the analysis in Michael A. Newton’s 'How the International Criminal Court Threatens Treaty Norms' of the jurisdiction in respect of their territory conferred on the ICC by States parties to the Rome Statute. It argues that, while the maxim 'nemo plus iuris transferre potest quam ipse habet' emphasized by Newton cannot be gainsaid, the question is less 'quantum iuris', or how much right a state possesses and passes on, than 'quid ius' or 'quia iura', or which right or rights. Jurisdiction is not a solid block of 'right'. It is a layering of different rights, whose existence, moreover, must be distinguished from their exercise. An appreciation of these subtleties leads to a different conclusion as to the competence of the Court to entertain proceedings in the cases highlighted by Newton, whatever this competence may mean for breach by a State party of its other treaties.

Keywords: international criminal court, treaty law

JEL Classification: K33

Suggested Citation

O'Keefe, Roger, 'Quid', Not 'Quantum': A Comment on 'How the International Criminal Court Threatens Treaty Norms' (2016). (2016) 49 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 433–441, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3496743

Roger O'Keefe (Contact Author)

Bocconi University - Department of Law ( email )

Via Roentgen, 1
Milan, Milan 20136
Italy

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
50
Abstract Views
302
PlumX Metrics