Social Checks and Balances: A Private Fairness Doctrine
41 Pages Posted: 9 Dec 2019
Date Written: December 6, 2019
This Essay proposes a private standards and certification system to induce media firms to provide more complete and accurate information. The Essay argues that this new private governance system is a viable response to the channelized flow of information that is exacerbating political polarization in the United States. Specifically, the Essay proposes development of a new private fairness doctrine to replace the standard repealed by the Federal Communications Commission in 1987. A broad-based, multi-stakeholder organization could develop and implement this private fairness doctrine, and the certification process could harness market and social pressure to influence the practices of traditional and new media firms. A growing literature demonstrates how private governance initiatives can perform the functions of government in the environmental, labor, gun control, animal welfare, fair trade, and other areas. The Essay argues that private governance initiatives such as the new private fairness doctrine also can bolster the social checks and balances that support the processes of democratic governance. Any intervention into the flow of information creates risks, but so does inaction, and the private fairness doctrine holds out the possibility of improving the information available for public discourse while limiting the risks of government intervention. In the long term, the concept of private governance also can stimulate creative thinking on interventions to improve other core democratic processes, including campaign finance, voting, ballot security, and others.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation