Making It Work: Legal Foundations for Administrative Reform of California's Housing Framework

88 Pages Posted: 16 Dec 2019 Last revised: 28 Jun 2021

See all articles by Christopher S. Elmendorf

Christopher S. Elmendorf

University of California, Davis - School of Law

Eric Biber

University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

Paavo Monkkonen

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

Moira O'Neill

University of California, Berkeley - Institute for Urban and Regional Development; University of Virginia, School of Architecture

Date Written: May 2, 2020

Abstract

Since 1980, California has had an ambitious planning framework on the books to make local governments accommodate their fair share of “regional housing need” “for all income levels.” The framework relied, however, on a rickety and complicated conveyor belt for converting regional housing targets into actual production. Superintending the conveyor belt was an administrative entity, the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), whose rules had no legal effect, and whose judgments about the adequacy of a local government’s housing plan received virtually no deference from the courts. This paper contends that HCD’s position has been fundamentally transformed by a series of individually modest but complementary bills enacted from 2017-2019. HCD now has authority to strengthen, simplify, and supplement the conveyor belt in ways that would have been (legally speaking) unimaginable just a few years ago. We argue (1) that HCD may adopt the “expected yield” definition of site capacity, which would more than the double the amount of zoned capacity that local governments must provide; (2) that HCD may promulgate metrics and standards for whether the supply of housing within a local government’s territory is substantially constrained; and (3) that HCD may insist, as a condition of housing-plan approval, that poorly performing local governments adopt major, substantive reforms to local development processes, regulations, and fees. Though it’s doubtful that the department could mandate particular constraint-mitigation measures, such as ministerial permitting, the department could incentive their adoption by announcing compliance safe harbors. Our objective in this paper is to lay the legal foundation for such departmental initiatives, not to say how they should be carried out. In future work, we plan to offer more concrete policy recommendations, and to relate our recommendations to evidence of local-government and HCD practice in the writing and reviewing of housing plans.

Keywords: land use, zoning, affordable housing, administrative law, planning, YIMBY, fair housing, affirmatively furthering fair housing

Suggested Citation

Elmendorf, Christopher S. and Biber, Eric and Monkkonen, Paavo and O'Neill, Moira, Making It Work: Legal Foundations for Administrative Reform of California's Housing Framework (May 2, 2020). 47 Ecology Law Quarterly 973-1060 (2020), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3500139 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3500139

Christopher S. Elmendorf (Contact Author)

University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )

Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
Davis, CA CA 95616-5201
United States
530-752-5756 (Phone)
530-753-5311 (Fax)

Eric Biber

University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )

215 Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States

Paavo Monkkonen

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) ( email )

405 Hilgard Avenue
Box 951361
Los Angeles, CA 90095
United States

Moira O'Neill

University of California, Berkeley - Institute for Urban and Regional Development ( email )

230 Bauer Wurster Hall
#1820
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.law.berkeley.edu/research/clee/about/people/moira-oneill/

University of Virginia, School of Architecture ( email )

Campbell Hall
P.O. Box 400122
Charlottesville, VA 22904
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
374
Abstract Views
2,558
rank
104,069
PlumX Metrics