Do firms follow the SEC’s confidential treatment protocols? Evidence from credit agreements

37 Pages Posted: 30 Dec 2019 Last revised: 1 Dec 2022

See all articles by Daniel Saavedra

Daniel Saavedra

UCLA Anderson School of Management

Date Written: November 22, 2022

Abstract

I examine whether firms follow the Security and Exchange Commission’s confidential treatment protocols when redacting potentially material information from their credit agreements. My findings suggest that most firms withhold potentially material information without submitting a request for confidential treatment to the SEC and without making interested parties aware of their information disadvantage. I also find evidence consistent with lender and borrower incentives driving the decision to withhold potentially material information from the credit agreement. Finally, my findings are consistent with lenders influencing redaction decisions not out of concern about rivals but because they do not want their other borrowers to see the terms.

Keywords: Disclosure, Banks, Redacted Credit Agreements, Redacted Disclosure, SEC Noncompliance

JEL Classification: G32, G21, C78, L14

Suggested Citation

Saavedra, Daniel, Do firms follow the SEC’s confidential treatment protocols? Evidence from credit agreements (November 22, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3500592 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3500592

Daniel Saavedra (Contact Author)

UCLA Anderson School of Management ( email )

Los Angeles, CA
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
219
Abstract Views
1,217
Rank
210,025
PlumX Metrics