Discarding Old Prejudices: Judicial Precedent and Aboriginal Title

5 Pages Posted: 13 Dec 2019

See all articles by Kent McNeil

Kent McNeil

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: October 28, 2019

Abstract

This talk on judicial precedent and Aboriginal title combines legal history and current law. The legal history is important because it informs the current law. It also reveals the racism in Canadian law that retarded the development of the concept of Aboriginal title until the 1970s.

My discussion of the early case law focuses on St. Catherine’s Milling and Lumber Co. v. The Queen, decided by the Privy Council in 1888. It was the leading judicial precedent on the source and content of Aboriginal title right up to the Supreme Court of Canada’s 1973 decision in Calder v. Attorney General of British Columbia. The question in St. Catherine’s was this: Did the Crown in right of Ontario or the Crown in right of Canada benefit from the surrender by the Saulteaux people of the Anishinaabe Nation of their Aboriginal title by Treaty 3 in 1873?

Suggested Citation

McNeil, Kent, Discarding Old Prejudices: Judicial Precedent and Aboriginal Title (October 28, 2019). Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3502970 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3502970

Kent McNeil (Contact Author)

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School ( email )

4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
54
Abstract Views
247
rank
357,590
PlumX Metrics