Seven Problems with Antidiscrimination Due Process

Forthcoming, Faulkner Law Review

24 Pages Posted: 1 Jan 2020

See all articles by Christopher R. Green

Christopher R. Green

University of Mississippi - School of Law

Date Written: December 15, 2019

Abstract

I explain seven problems with the view, suggested by Akhil Amar, Kurt Lash, and Ryan Williams, that the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments’ ban on “depriv[ing] any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law” entails freedom from the sort of racial discrimination banned by Bolling v. Sharpe and the Civil Rights Acts of 1866, 1870, and 1875:

1. The federal government long imposed racial restrictions on naturalization, beginning in 1790 and including a statute passed two weeks before the Civil Rights Act of 1875.

2. Six of the seven states that Williams identifies as following the Daniel-Webster-pioneered “general law” interpretation of due process imposed openly second-class status on racial grounds without thinking due process might pose any barrier.

3. Democrats fans of due process in 1862 and 1866, most prominently Reverdy Johnson, nonetheless opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1866. They did not think John Bingham’s unusual reading of “law” was baked into the Fourteenth Amendment.

4. Superlawyer Matthew Carpenter made clear that the Privileges or Immunities Clause, and no other clause in the Fourteenth Amendment, banned racial occupational limits.

5. The Republican-beloved Northwest Ordinance, Missouri Compromise, and Wilmot Proviso all labeled racially-discriminatory slavery, and fugitive re-enslavement, “lawful.”

6. “Law” in the Privileges or Immunities Clause covers racially-discriminatory statutes.

7. Many paradigmatic targets of anti-discrimination rules, e.g., special benefits to one racial group, deprive no one of life, liberty, or property.

Keywords: Fourteenth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Substantive Due Process, Due Process of Law, Privileges or Immunities Clause, Alienage, Citizenship, Bradwell v. Illinois, Matthew Carpenter, Reverdy Johnson, Daniel Webster, John Bingham, Thomas Cooley

Suggested Citation

Green, Christopher R., Seven Problems with Antidiscrimination Due Process (December 15, 2019). Forthcoming, Faulkner Law Review, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3504336

Christopher R. Green (Contact Author)

University of Mississippi - School of Law ( email )

Lamar Law Center
P.O. Box 1848
University, MS 38677
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
64
Abstract Views
553
rank
398,437
PlumX Metrics