Doceram, Cofemel and Brompton: How does the Current and Future CJEU Case Law Affect Digital Designs?

B. Pasa (ed.), Il design, l’innovazione tecnologica e digitale, Un dialogo interdisciplinare per un ripensamento delle tutele - Design, technological and digital innovation. Interdisciplinary proposals for reshaping legal protections, ESI Press, Naples, Forthcoming 2020

17 Pages Posted: 25 Mar 2020

See all articles by Estelle Derclaye

Estelle Derclaye

University of Nottingham, School of law

Date Written: December 20, 2019

Abstract

Digital design is generally associated with web design namely graphic design for digital products off or online. This includes web sites but also movies and videogames. These designs are, traditionally, in two dimensions and more recently, can be in three dimensions such as augmented or virtual reality. There are also designs initially made digitally namely computer-aided (CAD) designs which are then manufactured in the traditional way or more recently 3D printed. The concept of digital design is therefore broad involving both two-dimensional (2D) and three dimensional (3D) designs, both functional and non-functional (i.e. purely decorative) designs. This paper examines two recent and important decisions and one pending reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) affecting the protection of 2D and 3D designs including digital designs. In the EU, designs can be protected by several intellectual property laws, the chief ones being copyright and design laws. Designs can also be protected by patent and trade mark laws and in some Member States by utility model laws and unfair competition law. This contribution will focus only on copyright and design laws. After having introduced the protection for designs in the EU by design rights, section 1 summarises and comments on the Doceram decision. Section 2 then explains how copyright protects designs and then comments on the Cofemel and Brompton cases. Section 3 proposes solutions raised by these decisions before the chapter concludes.

Keywords: copyright, design, cofemel, doceram, European Union, copyright/design interface, functionality

Suggested Citation

Derclaye, Estelle, Doceram, Cofemel and Brompton: How does the Current and Future CJEU Case Law Affect Digital Designs? (December 20, 2019). B. Pasa (ed.), Il design, l’innovazione tecnologica e digitale, Un dialogo interdisciplinare per un ripensamento delle tutele - Design, technological and digital innovation. Interdisciplinary proposals for reshaping legal protections, ESI Press, Naples, Forthcoming 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3507802 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3507802

Estelle Derclaye (Contact Author)

University of Nottingham, School of law ( email )

Nottingham NG7 2RD
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/law2/staff/estelle.derclaye

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
243
Abstract Views
885
rank
145,049
PlumX Metrics