Have Robots Grounded the Flying Geese?: Evidence from Greenfield FDI in Manufacturing

Abstract

For decades, manufacturers around the world have outsourced production to countries with lower labor costs. However, there is a concern that robotization in high-income countries will challenge this shifting international division of labor known as the "flying geese" paradigm. Greenfield foreign direct investment decisions constitute a forward-looking indicator of where production is expected, rather than trade flows that reflect past investment decisions. Exploiting differences across countries and industries, the intensity of robot use in high-income countries has a positive impact on foreign direct investment growth from high-income countries to low- and middle-income countries over 2004-15. Past a threshold, however, increased robotization in high-income countries has a negative impact on foreign direct investment growth. Only 3 percent of the sample exceeds the threshold level beyond which further automation results in negative foreign direct investment growth and is consistent with re-shoring. For another 25 percent of the sample, the impact of robotization on the growth of foreign direct investment is positive, but at a rate that is declining. So, although these are early warning signs, automation in high-income countries has resulted in growing foreign direct investment for more than two-thirds of the sample under consideration. Some geese may be slowing, but for now, most continue to fly.

Keywords: Common Carriers Industry, Food & Beverage Industry, Pulp & Paper Industry, General Manufacturing, Construction Industry, Business Cycles and Stabilization Policies, Plastics & Rubber Industry, Textiles, Apparel & Leather Industry, International Trade and Trade Rules, Transport Services, Labor Markets, Rural Labor Markets, Trade and Services