Why Europe Should Love Tax Competition - and the U.S. Even More so
40 Pages Posted: 15 Nov 2002 Last revised: 30 Oct 2010
Date Written: November 2002
Abstract
Is global competition for mobile capital harmful (less public goods) or beneficial (less government waste)? This paper combines both aspects within a generalized version of the comparative public finance model (Persson, Roland and Tabellini, 2000) by introducing multiple countries and endogenous tax bases. We consider the role of political institutions and compare parliamentary democracies (Europe) and presidential-congressional systems (USA) to show that increasing tax competition is likely to improve voter welfare, even if public good supply decreases because rents to politicians also fall. The conditions for voter welfare to improve are less stringent under the presidential-congressional system than under parliamentary democracies. Increasing tax competition lowers voter welfare if the only benefit to politicians is to divert resources from the government budget and the future is valued highly.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Fiscal Paradise: Foreign Tax Havens and American Business
By James R. Hines Jr. and Eric M. Rice
-
Altered States: Taxes and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment in America
-
Tax Policy and Foreign Direct Investment in the United States
-
Coming Home to America: Dividend Repatriations by U.S. Multinationals
-
Taxation and Foreign Direct Investment: A Synthesis of Empirical Research
By Ruud A. De Mooij and Sjef Ederveen
-
Income Shifting in U.S. Multinational Corporations
By David Harris, Randall Morck, ...
