Do Commissions Cause Investment Adviser Misconduct?

37 Pages Posted: 30 Jan 2020

See all articles by Tarun Patel

Tarun Patel

Southern Methodist University (SMU) - Finance Department

Date Written: November 8, 2019

Abstract

Sales commissions may present a conflict of interest that allows investment advisers to obtain rents from uninformed clients. Alternatively, commissions might be a contracting solution to motivate information provision. To analyze the relation between commissions and adviser misconduct, I exploit quasi-exogenous changes in individual investment advisers' compensation arrangements caused by mergers between large registered investment advisory firms. The opportunity to earn sales commissions increases the probability that an adviser engages in misconduct, but competition is an important mediator. In regions with greater competition, sales commissions decrease misconduct claims. Increased misconduct from commissions is concentrated among low-experience advisers and male advisers. Damages paid out in claims involving commission-motivated advisers are $25,013 (36%) greater than other claims. The experimental design rules out latent firm and market explanations. Overall, I find that the connection between conflicts of interest and information provision depends on the competitive environment.

Keywords: financial advice, commissions, kickbacks, misconduct, investment advisers

JEL Classification: G20, G24, D18, K42

Suggested Citation

Patel, Tarun, Do Commissions Cause Investment Adviser Misconduct? (November 8, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3514987 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3514987

Tarun Patel (Contact Author)

Southern Methodist University (SMU) - Finance Department ( email )

United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
107
Abstract Views
841
Rank
461,488
PlumX Metrics