Digital Markets, Rules of Conduct and Liability of Online Intermediaries—Analysis of Two Case Studies: Unfair Commercial Practices and Trade Secrets Infringement

Forthcoming, G. Frosio (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Online Intermediary Liability, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020

Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 20-01

27 Pages Posted: 23 Jan 2020

See all articles by Valentina Moscon

Valentina Moscon

Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition

Reto Hilty

Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition; University of Zurich; Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU)

Date Written: November 28, 2019

Abstract

This chapter will explore the liability of online intermediaries (OIs) under European law, with a focus on infringements of rights and legal interests other than IPRs. The main research question is whether European law adopts a consistent regulatory approach with regard to content hosted by OIs against rules on market functioning that do not assign exclusive rights but simply impose rules of conduct (e.g. rules on unfair commercial practices). This chapter investigate whether and under which conditions OIs are liable and—beyond the liability of OIs—whether the interests protected by European laws governing the functioning of the market receive the same level of protection in different contexts. To carry on such analysis, the chapter takes into consideration as case studies two bodies of the law, the first one dealing with online unfair commercial practices (UCPs) and the second one with the unlawful acquisition, use, and disclosure of trade secrets. After having summarized the distinguishing features of the safe harbour regime and its interplay with injunctive relief, the chapter will focus on the UCPs and Trade Secrets Directives in relation to the position of OIs. Reference is made to the criteria of interpretation of European law in order to assess the relationship between specific provisions and the concurrent regime set forth in the e-Commerce Directive. Finally, this chapter assesses the emerging results, highlighting the issues which hinder the creation of a coherent and satisfying legal framework.

Keywords: unfair competition, trade secrets, liability, online intermediaries, EU law, remedies, injunctive relief

Suggested Citation

Moscon, Valentina and Hilty, Reto, Digital Markets, Rules of Conduct and Liability of Online Intermediaries—Analysis of Two Case Studies: Unfair Commercial Practices and Trade Secrets Infringement (November 28, 2019). Forthcoming, G. Frosio (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Online Intermediary Liability, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020, Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 20-01, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3517134 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3517134

Valentina Moscon (Contact Author)

Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition ( email )

Marstallplatz 1
Munich, Bayern 80539
Germany

Reto Hilty

Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition ( email )

Marstallplatz 1
Munich, Bayern 80539
Germany

HOME PAGE: http://www.ip.mpg.de

University of Zurich

Rämistrasse 74/7
Zürich, CH-8001
Switzerland

Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU)

Munich, 80539
Germany

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
361
Abstract Views
1,481
Rank
174,332
PlumX Metrics