Notes on National Language & Literature Advocacy and Research Productivity: The Case for Filipino and Panitikan (Literature) as Required Subjects in Philippine Colleges and Universities

15 Pages Posted: 8 Feb 2020

Date Written: January 15, 2020

Abstract

On March 2019, the Philippine Supreme Court threw out the petition filed in 2015 against the abolition of Filipino Language (Filipino) – the country’s national language – and Panitikan (Literature) as required subjects in all tertiary-level institutions. Advocates succeeded in jumpstarting the process to legislate the said subjects as curricular requirements through House Bill 223 which six representatives of national partylist groups in Congress filed on July 1, 2019. The bill barely moved for 6 months, garnering just another co-author, and it is still without any parallel version in the Philippine Senate. This paper is aimed at presenting strong arguments – related to research productivity – to help convince legislators in throwing their weight behind the said vital piece of legislation.

Keywords: Curriculum, Filipino Language, Literature, Higher Education, Language Planning

Suggested Citation

San Juan, David Michael, Notes on National Language & Literature Advocacy and Research Productivity: The Case for Filipino and Panitikan (Literature) as Required Subjects in Philippine Colleges and Universities (January 15, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3519798 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3519798

David Michael San Juan (Contact Author)

De La Salle University ( email )

2401 Taft Ave Malate, Manila
Metro Manila, 1004
Philippines

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,131
Abstract Views
2,259
rank
22,243
PlumX Metrics