Correcting the Record: Post-Publication Corrections and the Integrity of Legal Scholarship

Law Library Journal, Vol. 112, p. 365, 2020

Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 623

29 Pages Posted: 21 Jan 2020 Last revised: 18 Dec 2020

Date Written: January 17, 2020

Abstract

In the age of electronic publications, post-publication correction of errors in law journal articles may seem like a simple, technical matter. Unfortunately, a lack of standardized practices or policies related to errors discovered after publication has allowed multiple versions of articles to co-exist and retracted or plagiarizing articles to remain unnoted. An examination of a sampling of articles with publication errors highlights the need for a uniform system to allow readers to know which version of an article is the most current and correct, what changes have been made to corrected articles, and whether other, even more serious, problems were discovered. After reviewing the scope of the problem, the article suggests policies and practices law journals should adopt to preserve the integrity of the scholarship they publish and ways that law journals could work together to provide a uniform solution.

Keywords: law journals, law reviews, legal publishing, errata, scholarly integrity

Suggested Citation

Sinder, Janet, Correcting the Record: Post-Publication Corrections and the Integrity of Legal Scholarship (January 17, 2020). Law Library Journal, Vol. 112, p. 365, 2020, Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 623, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3521475 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3521475

Janet Sinder (Contact Author)

Brooklyn Law School ( email )

Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
165
Abstract Views
1,558
rank
220,556
PlumX Metrics