The Managerial Effects of Algorithmic Fairness Activism
AEA Papers & Proceedings, 110 (2020), Forthcoming
17 Pages Posted: 18 Feb 2020
Date Written: January 22, 2020
How do ethical arguments affect AI adoption in business? We randomly expose business decision-makers to arguments used in AI fairness activism. Arguments emphasizing the inescapability of algorithmic bias lead managers to abandon AI for manual review by humans and report greater expectations about lawsuits and negative PR. These effects persist even when AI lowers gender and racial disparities, and when engineering investments to address AI fairness are feasible. Emphasis on status quo comparisons yields opposite effects. We also measure the effects of "scientific veneer" in AI ethics arguments. Scientific veneer changes managerial behavior, but does not asymmetrically benefit favorable (vs critical) AI activism.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation