An Illustrated Case for Unemployment Insurance Reform

30 Pages Posted: 21 Feb 2020

See all articles by Christopher J. O'Leary

Christopher J. O'Leary

W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research

Stephen A. Wandner

National Academy of Social Insurance (NASI)

Date Written: January 24, 2020

Abstract

We present a graphic case for unemployment insurance (UI) program reform. Through a series of illustrations summarizing historical trends, we show how the UI system has diverged from its intended purposes. Our figures show the decline of the program in addressing its essential aims of paying adequate unemployment compensation during involuntary unemployment and providing reemployment services. We illustrate the big differences in UI programs that have emerged because of the broad discretion afforded states to determine benefit generosity. We also illustrate declines in the financial means for providing benefits and reemployment services and a widening divergence among states in the quality of UI programs. Our concluding section presents a list of reforms that would restore UI as a pillar of social insurance and the labor market.

Keywords: unemployment insurance, benefit eligibility, benefit adequacy, wage replacement ratio, recipiency rate, forward funding, taxable wage base, experience rating, reemployment services, program administration

JEL Classification: J65, H71, J68

Suggested Citation

O'Leary, Christopher J. and Wandner, Stephen A., An Illustrated Case for Unemployment Insurance Reform (January 24, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3525097 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3525097

Christopher J. O'Leary (Contact Author)

W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research ( email )

300 South Westnedge Avenue
Kalamazoo, MI 49007-4686
United States
269-343-5541 (Phone)
269-343-3308 (Fax)

Stephen A. Wandner

National Academy of Social Insurance (NASI) ( email )

1776 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Suite 615
Washington, DC 20036-1904
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
185
Abstract Views
661
Rank
297,443
PlumX Metrics