Precedent, Non-Universal Injunctions, and Judicial Departmentalism: A Model of Constitutional Adjudication

72 Pages Posted: 10 Feb 2020 Last revised: 4 Mar 2020

See all articles by Howard Wasserman

Howard Wasserman

Florida International University (FIU) - College of Law

Date Written: January 27, 2020

Abstract

This Article proposes a model of constitutional adjudication that offers a deeper, richer, and more accurate vision than the simple “courts strike down unconstitutional laws” narrative that pervades legal, popular, and political discourse around constitutional litigation. The model rests on five principles:

1) an actionable constitutional violation arises from the actual or threatened enforcement of an invalid law, not the existence of the law itself;

2) the remedy when a law is constitutionally invalid is for the court to halt enforcement;

3) remedies must be particularized to the parties to a case and courts should not issue “universal” or “nationwide” injunctions;

4) a judgment controls the parties to the case, while the court’s opinion creates precedent to resolve future cases; and

5) rather than judicial supremacy, federal courts operate on a model of “judicial departmentalism,” in which executive and legislative officials must abide by judgments in particular cases, but exercise independent interpretive authority as to constitutional meaning, even where those interpretations conflict with judicial understanding.

The synthesis of these five principles produces a constitutional system defined by the following features:

1) the judgment in one case declaring a law invalid prohibits enforcement of the law as to the parties to the case;

2) the challenged law remains on the books; and

3) the challenged law may be enforced against non-parties to the original case, but systemic and institutional incentives weigh against such enforcement efforts and push towards compliance with judicial understandings.

Keywords: Constitution, Litigation, Judicial Review, Departmentalism, Injunctions, Remedies

Suggested Citation

Wasserman, Howard, Precedent, Non-Universal Injunctions, and Judicial Departmentalism: A Model of Constitutional Adjudication (January 27, 2020). 23 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 1077 (2020), Florida International University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 20-01, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3526242

Howard Wasserman (Contact Author)

Florida International University (FIU) - College of Law ( email )

University Park, DB 2065
Miami, FL 33199
United States
305-348-7482 (Phone)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
46
Abstract Views
220
PlumX Metrics