What Timbs Does Not Say
George Washington Law Review On the Docket (March 7, 2019),
3 Pages Posted: 24 Feb 2020
Date Written: March 7, 2019
Abstract
In Timbs v. Indiana, the United States Supreme Court decided that the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment applied to the states. In conjunction with this discussion, it did not mention the few rights that remain unincorporated and explain why this so. Practically, after Timbs, only jury rights -- unanimity, the grand jury right, and the civil jury right -- do not apply to the states. Given their history and importance, these rights should be incorporated.
Keywords: grand jury, civil jury, unanimity, Timbs, jury
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Thomas, Suja A., What Timbs Does Not Say (March 7, 2019). George Washington Law Review On the Docket (March 7, 2019),, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3526403
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.