Cecilia Kell v Canada

Feminist Judgments in International Law (Hart 2019) Loveday Hodson and Troy Lavers (eds)

SMU Dedman School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 463

41 Pages Posted: 26 Feb 2020 Last revised: 7 Mar 2020

See all articles by Jessie M. Hohmann

Jessie M. Hohmann

University of Technology Sydney

Lolita Buckner Inniss

University of Colorado Law School

Enzamaria Tramontana

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: January 29, 2018

Abstract

This paper offers a feminist re-writing of the CEDAW Committee Decision in the Kell v Canada case.

Keywords: feminist methodology, intersectionality, right to housing, violence against women, equality, indigenous

Suggested Citation

Hohmann, Jessie M. and Buckner Inniss, Lolita and Tramontana, Enzamaria, Cecilia Kell v Canada (January 29, 2018). Feminist Judgments in International Law (Hart 2019) Loveday Hodson and Troy Lavers (eds), SMU Dedman School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 463, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3527806

Jessie M. Hohmann (Contact Author)

University of Technology Sydney ( email )

15 Broadway, Ultimo
PO Box 123
Sydney, NSW 2007
Australia

Lolita Buckner Inniss

University of Colorado Law School

401 UCB
Boulder, CO 80309
United States

Enzamaria Tramontana

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
59
Abstract Views
320
rank
441,003
PlumX Metrics