A New Report of Entick v. Carrington (1765)

64 Pages Posted: 6 Feb 2020

Date Written: January 31, 2020


The Supreme Court has described Entick v. Carrington (1765) as “the true and ultimate expression of constitutional law” for the Founding generation, and for more than 130 years, the Court has read Entick carefully to learn the original meaning of the Fourth Amendment. But the Court has been reading a flawed version of the case. This Article publishes, for the first time, a previously unknown manuscript report of Entick v. Carrington. We explain why this version is more reliable than other reports of the case, as well as how this new discovery might challenge prevailing assumptions about the Fourth Amendment and Entick’s place in British and American constitutional history more broadly. Although we leave a full reevaluation of Entick for future scholarship, we show that any future judicial or academic discussion of the case must take this new report into account.

Keywords: legal history, Fourth Amendment, constitutional history, constitutional law, rule of law, law reporting

Suggested Citation

Arvind, T. T. and Burset, Christian, A New Report of Entick v. Carrington (1765) (January 31, 2020). Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 200131. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3529420 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3529420

T. T. Arvind

York Law School ( email )

University of York
Heslington, York YO10
United Kingdom

Christian Burset (Contact Author)

Notre Dame Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 780
Notre Dame, IN 46556-0780
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics