Temporary and Proposed Section 752 Regulations: Progress or Regress?

39 Pages Posted: 12 Feb 2020

Date Written: 2017

Abstract

In October, 2016, the Internal Revenue Service issued temporary and proposed regulations under Internal Revenue Code Sections 752 and 704 (“the 2016 Regulations”). The author reviews and analyzes these regulations, and concludes that the 2016 Regulations properly deny economic risk of loss for unduly remote bottom dollar guarantees. He also concludes, however, that the IRS exceeded its regulatory authority when it also denied economic risk of loss on bottom-dollar guarantees where the risk to the guarantor was not remote. In addition, he observes that the 2016 Regulations lead to an inappropriate disjuncture with Section 465 and create rules that are too vague for real-world application. He argues that, at a minimum, the 2016 Regulations should be brought into compliance with the IRS’s authority and be subject to a de minimis rule. But his primary recommendation is that the 2016 Regulations be withdrawn and replaced with anti-abuse rules.

Keywords: bottom-dollar guarantee, economic risk of loss, recourse debt, commercially reasonable, anti-abuse regulation

JEL Classification: K34

Suggested Citation

Schwidetzky, Walter D., Temporary and Proposed Section 752 Regulations: Progress or Regress? (2017). 35 Journal of Taxation of Investments 3 (2017), University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3535595

Walter D. Schwidetzky (Contact Author)

University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )

1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218
United States
(410) 837-4410 (Phone)
(410) 837-4492 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
5
Abstract Views
143
PlumX Metrics