Social Science and the Analysis of Environmental Policy

U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 20-12

Review of Policy Research, Vol. 37, p. 578, 2020

57 Pages Posted: 14 Feb 2020 Last revised: 26 Aug 2020

See all articles by Cary Coglianese

Cary Coglianese

University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School

Shana Starobin

Bowdoin College

Date Written: February 7, 2020

Abstract

As much as environmental problems manifest themselves as problems with the natural environment, environmental problems — and their solutions — are ultimately social and behavioral in nature. Just as the natural sciences provide a basis for understanding the need for environmental policy and informing its design, the social sciences also contribute in significant ways to the understanding of the behavioral sources of environmental problems, both in terms of individual incentives and collective action challenges. In addition, the social sciences have contributed much to the understanding of the ways that laws and other institutions can be designed to solve environmental problems. In this paper, we distill core intellectual frameworks from among the social sciences that scaffold modern environmental policy in industrialized country contexts — focusing on key contributions principally from political science, economics, psychology, and sociology to the analysis of environmental problems and their solutions. These frameworks underlie how environmental problems are defined at multiple scales and the conceptualization and empirical testing of policy solutions that seek to shape human behavior in ways that improve environmental quality and promote sustainable economic growth. With the planet facing continued environmental threats, improving environmental policy decision making depends on the insights and frameworks of social science research in addition to those of the natural sciences.

Keywords: environmental law, economics, public policy, externalities, transaction costs, public goods, commons, collective action, risk assessment, efficiency, feasibility, fairness, equity, liability, means-based, performance-based, market-based, management-based regulation, disclosure, incentives

JEL Classification: D61, D62, D63, D72, K23, K32

Suggested Citation

Coglianese, Cary and Starobin, Shana, Social Science and the Analysis of Environmental Policy (February 7, 2020). U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 20-12, Review of Policy Research, Vol. 37, p. 578, 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3537708

Cary Coglianese (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School ( email )

3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
215-898-6867 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.upenn.edu/coglianese

Shana Starobin

Bowdoin College ( email )

Brunswick, ME 04011
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
190
Abstract Views
1,284
Rank
306,405
PlumX Metrics