Are We All Better Drivers than Average? Self-Perception and Biased Behaviour
25 Pages Posted: 22 Nov 2002
Date Written: October 2002
Abstract
This Paper studies a model where individuals have imperfect self-knowledge and learning is costly. It shows that the endogenous decision to collect information before taking an action creates a systematic and testable bias in the aggregate behaviour of agents in the economy. More precisely, individuals distort the information acquisition procedure so as to favour the possibility of undertaking the action that generates the highest benefits in some states, even if it also generates the biggest losses in some others. The Paper thus explains within a rational framework why 80% of individuals may perceive themselves as being brighter, better drivers and more able entrepreneurs than their average peer. Applications to biases in career choices and judicial decisions are discussed.
Keywords: Self-perception, bias in judgement, decision-making
JEL Classification: A12, D83
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Organization of Delegated Expertise
By Denis Gromb and David Martimort
-
A Theory of Influence: The Strategic Value of Public Ignorance
By Isabelle Brocas and Juan D. Carrillo
-
A Theory of Influence: The Strategic Value of Public Ignorance
By Isabelle Brocas and Juan D. Carrillo
-
Delegated Expertise - When are Good Projects Bad News?
By Markus Walzl and Eberhard Feess
-
Active Agents, Passive Principals: Does High-Powered CEO Compensation Really Improve Incentives?
By James Dow and Clara C. Raposo
-
Reconceptualizing the Expert Witness: Social Costs, Current Controls and Proposed Responses
-
Do Managers with Limited Liability Take More Risky Decisions? An Information Acquisition Model