Characterizing Multi-Door Criminal Justice: A Comparative Analysis of Three Criminal Justice Mechanism
Tali Gal & Hadar Dancig-rosenberg (2020). Characterizing Multi-Door Criminal Justice: a Comparative Analysis of Three Criminal Justice Mechanism. New Criminal Law Review, Vol. 23, Number 1, pp. 139–166.
26 Pages Posted: 16 Mar 2020
Date Written: February 18, 2020
This article provides an empirical, comparative analysis of three criminal justice programs that reflect different social and ideological accounts: community courts, arraignment hearings, and restorative justice. The study draws on empirical findings that have been collected over three years in Israel, through observations and archival documentation of these mechanisms. Using the Criminal Law Taxonomy developed elsewhere by the authors as an analytical tool, the comparison is based on characteristics that relate to the structure, content, stakeholders, and outcomes of these justice mechanisms, emphasizing the plurality we have today in multi-door criminal justice systems. The comparative analysis highlights differences and similarities among various justice mechanisms, and offers policy makers and criminal justice practitioners important insights for referring different cases to various mechanisms.
Keywords: multi-door criminal justice, community courts, restorative justice, arraignment hearings, criminal law taxonomy, criminal procedure
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation