Mass Production Goods, Torts and Justice: The Problem of Opt-Out

46 Pages Posted: 22 Nov 2002

Abstract

U.S. Judicial Conference endorsement of a "second opt-out opportunity" for class action settlements to supplement the option for pre-certification exit under Rule 23(b)(3) is retrograde. It represents a victory for the myopic "proceduralist" way of thinking and a loss for everyone whose welfare depends on federal class action enforcement of tort and other civil liability to prevent and compensate harm resulting from business risk-taking ("mass production risks"). To be sure, the Conference merely provides explicit authority for what is already widespread practice, but that hardly excuses making matters worse. Indeed, the Conference, as the author of the basically flawed 1966 revisions of Rule 23, had - and irresponsibly squandered - the legislative chance to make matters much better. At minimum, it should have applied advances in theoretical and empirical understanding of the social benefits derived from collectively adjudicating civil liability in business risk-taking cases not only to reject the "second opt-out," but also to eliminate the requirement for pre-certification opt-out.

Suggested Citation

Rosenberg, Michael, Mass Production Goods, Torts and Justice: The Problem of Opt-Out. University of Chicago Law Forum, 2003. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=354120 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.354120

Michael Rosenberg (Contact Author)

Harvard Law School ( email )

1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-496-4558 (Phone)
617-495-1110 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
137
Abstract Views
1,544
rank
209,170
PlumX Metrics