Calibrated Economic Models Add Focus, Accuracy, and Persuasiveness to Merger Analysis
22 Pages Posted: 16 Dec 2002
Abstract
In the competitive analysis of mergers, "calibrated economic models" are standard, formal models, particularly monopoly and oligopoly models, in which the values of the key parameters are set on the basis of observable features of the industry under review. Calibrated economic models offer three advantages in merger analysis: (1) They bring key issues into sharper focus by making assumptions explicit and identifying which factors are critical and precisely how they matter. (2) They add accuracy by quantifying issues of importance and relying on calculations rather than intuition. (3) They enhance persuasiveness in a judicial proceeding by making the analysis more concrete and better grounded in both the facts of case and economic theory. The paper illustrates these advantages in market delineation and in the prediction of price and other effects of mergers through the use of simulation.
JEL Classification: K0
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Unilateral Competitive Effects of Horizontal Mergers
By Gregory J. Werden and Luke M. Froeb
-
Post-Merger Product Repositioning
By Amit Kumar Gandhi, Luke M. Froeb, ...
-
Pass-Through Rates and the Price Effects of Mergers
By Luke M. Froeb, Steven Tschantz, ...
-
Mergers when Firms Compete by Choosing both Price and Promotion
By Luke M. Froeb, Steven Tenn, ...
-
Merger Simulation with Brand-Level Margin: Extending Pcaids with Nests
-
Vertical Restraints and the Effects of Upstream Horizontal Mergers
By Luke M. Froeb, Steven Tschantz, ...
-
Efficiency Considerations in Merger Enforcement
By Robert H. Lande and Alan A. Fisher
-
Quantifying the Scope for Efficiency Defense in Merger Control: The Werden-Froeb-Index