Auditors’ Responses to Asset Redeployability

54 Pages Posted: 18 Aug 2020

See all articles by Ferdinand A Gul

Ferdinand A Gul

Deakin University

Karen Lai

Shenzhen Audencia Financial Technology Institute

Tongxia Li

Beijing Normal University

Jeffrey Pittman

Memorial University ; Virginia Tech

Date Written: November 13, 2019

Abstract

This study shows that auditors are more likely to charge higher audit fees, issue false-positive going concern opinions (i.e., Type I error), and resign from high asset redeployability (AR) firms. In supplemental tests, we use path analysis to show that the significant associations between AR and auditor responses can be explained by higher inherent risk (earnings management and abnormal asset sales) and audit business risk (misstatements and litigation risk). Collectively, our results suggest that auditors tend to react conservatively when firms are associated with high AR.

Keywords: asset redeployability; earnings management, asset sales, business risk, auditor responses

JEL Classification: G31, M41, M42

Suggested Citation

Gul, Ferdinand A and Lai, Karen and Li, Tongxia and Pittman, Jeffrey A., Auditors’ Responses to Asset Redeployability (November 13, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3543067 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3543067

Ferdinand A Gul

Deakin University ( email )

Australia

Karen Lai (Contact Author)

Shenzhen Audencia Financial Technology Institute

3688 Nanhai Boulevard
Nanshan
Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060
China

Tongxia Li

Beijing Normal University ( email )

18 Jinfeng Road
Xiangzhou
Zhuhai, Guangdong 519085
China

Jeffrey A. Pittman

Memorial University ( email )

St. John's, Newfoundland A1B 3X5
Canada
709-737-3100 (Phone)
709-737-7680 (Fax)

Virginia Tech ( email )

United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
166
Abstract Views
883
Rank
285,619
PlumX Metrics