Ex Machina: Technological Disruption and the Future of Artificial Intelligence in Legal Writing

36 Pages Posted: 27 Feb 2020

See all articles by John Campbell

John Campbell

University of Denver Sturm College of Law

Date Written: February 25, 2020

Abstract

Technology is disrupting the practice of law and revolutionizing how lawyers work. This revolution is made more powerful because it is increasingly coupled with a rigorous and scientific approach to the law. In some ways law is looking more like a Silicon Valley startup and less like the oak-paneled law firms of the last 200 years.

As law, technology, and science merge, the implications for the profession are wide sweeping. This article explores changes coming to persuasive legal writing, offering new thoughts on what the future will hold. Specifically, this article pilots a method for applying technology and science to measure, analyze, and improve persuasive legal writing, offering it as a proof of concept that anchors the article’s broader, and perhaps more controversial assertion.

Namely, more powerful and refined persuasive legal writing software tools, fueled by artificial intelligence, should and will disrupt and reshape significant portions of the legal space, including how legal writing is taught and how it is produced. The effect will be to view legal writing as more science, and less art. The next set of luminaries won’t rely on anecdote or intuition to teach or create legal writing; they will rely on software and data.

Suggested Citation

Campbell, John, Ex Machina: Technological Disruption and the Future of Artificial Intelligence in Legal Writing (February 25, 2020). U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 20-4, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3544233 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3544233

John Campbell (Contact Author)

University of Denver Sturm College of Law ( email )

2255 E. Evans Avenue
Denver, CO 80208
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
154
Abstract Views
793
rank
226,452
PlumX Metrics