A Road Paved with Good Intentions?: FERC’s Illegal War on State Electricity Subsidies

Electricity Journal, Vol. 33, Issue 5 (2020)

10 Pages Posted: 24 Mar 2020 Last revised: 15 May 2020

See all articles by Todd S. Aagaard

Todd S. Aagaard

Villanova University - School of Law

Andrew N. Kleit

Pennsylvania State University

Date Written: February 26, 2020

Abstract

On December 19, 2019, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an order dramatically expanding the Minimum Offer Price Rule in PJM’s capacity market. The order changes how electricity-generating resources that receive state subsidies are treated in federally regulated wholesale electricity markets. In short, a two-member majority of FERC commissioners, over the strong dissent of the third, decided that the Federal Power Act requires penalizing state-subsidized generation in order to “level the playing field” of wholesale competitive electricity markets. On its face, the goal of leveling a playing field is laudable. In actuality, however, FERC’s order does nothing of the sort. Instead, it creates numerous arbitrary distinctions, forces electricity customers to pay for excess capacity, and runs roughshod over the Federal Power Act’s apportionment of federal and state regulatory authority.

Most initial reviews of FERC’s order have offered scathing criticism of its negative policy consequences, especially the adverse effects it will have on renewable energy development.

Our critique, while not inconsistent with these other commentaries, adds two perspectives not represented thus far in the reaction to FERC’s order. First, even as we are critical of FERC’s conclusions in its order, we explain how the FERC majority got to the point where it felt compelled to take action against state subsidies and why that judgment, although understandable in some respects, is misguided. FERC’s action follows logically from a flawed policy adopted by a Democratic-majority Commission in 2011. Second, we explain why FERC’s order, in addition to creating poor policy consequences, also fails to create a mechanism for a just and reasonable price and violates both the Administrative Procedure Act and Federal Power Act.

Suggested Citation

Aagaard, Todd S. and Kleit, Andrew N., A Road Paved with Good Intentions?: FERC’s Illegal War on State Electricity Subsidies (February 26, 2020). Electricity Journal, Vol. 33, Issue 5 (2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3544876

Todd S. Aagaard (Contact Author)

Villanova University - School of Law ( email )

299 N. Spring Mill Road
Villanova, PA 19085
United States
610-519-3001 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: https://www1.villanova.edu/villanova/law/academics/faculty/Facultyprofiles/ToddAagaard.html

Andrew N. Kleit

Pennsylvania State University ( email )

University Park
109 Hosler Building
State College, PA 16802
United States
814-865-0711 (Phone)
814-865-3663 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
140
Abstract Views
508
rank
223,664
PlumX Metrics