Brexit, Prorogation and Popcorn: Implications of Miller (No 2) for New Zealand
16 Pages Posted: 26 Mar 2020 Last revised: 27 May 2020
Date Written: February 25, 2020
Keynote address to the Government Law – Year in Review conference, New Zealand Centre for Public Law, Victoria University of Wellington (February 2020).
This address narrates, explains and critiques the UK Supreme Court's decision in Miller (No 2), where it ruled Parliament was unlawfully prorogued, and discusses the implications of the decision for New Zealand.
Keywords: Public law, prorogation, Brexit, R (Miller) v Prime Minister  UKSC 41 (Miller (No 2))
JEL Classification: K1, K10, K30, K40
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation