Securities Regulation and Social Media

52 Pages Posted: 6 Mar 2020 Last revised: 27 Nov 2020

See all articles by Seth Oranburg

Seth Oranburg

University of New Hampshire Franklin Pierce School of Law; Thomas R. Kline School of Law of Duquesne University

Date Written: March 4, 2020

Abstract

Federal securities regulation originally divided corporate finance into two neat categories, public and private. In 1933, private financing was limited to “sophisticated” investors but otherwise lightly regulated. Public financing became heavily regulated. In 1982, the SEC introduced Reg D, which introduced the concept of “general solicitation” to clarify the distinction between public and private offerings. Reg D is well understood to prohibit newspaper advertisements and permit direct solicitations to venture capital investors. This enabled great wealth consolidation in regions like Silicon Valley while effectively banning general solicitations in private offerings.

Now, social media communication challenges the definition of “general solicitation.” Although social media comes in a multitude of forms, there is no guidance as to whether a single post or tweet might violate securities regulations. Confusion and fear of violating the ban on general solicitation chills online investment, even though online investment technology offers new and better means of protecting investors from fraud and undue risk.

Meanwhile, society has grown wary of regulations that tend to concentrate immense wealth amid a privileged few. Movements like Occupy Wall Street demanded that ordinary Americans gain equal access to financial markets, and legislators adopted equal access to capital as the national entrepreneurship policy.

In today’s interconnected age, the general solicitation ban has a disparate impact on young, rural, poor, and otherwise less established entrepreneurs. It systematically advantages established, urban, wealthy, and other well- connected businesspeople. The unintended consequence of the general solicitation ban is a disparate impact upon the members of society who could benefit the most from entrepreneurial opportunities. The general solicitation ban helps the rich and well connected get richer while excluding new entrepreneurs and diverse investors from capital markets. The ban is technologically and socially out of date. Accordingly, the ban carries the heavy burden of proving that it prevents enough fraud to be worth its cost. It has not met this heavy burden. Therefore, the general solicitation ban should be abolished.

Keywords: securities regulation, entrepreneurship, corporate finance, startup law, social media, general solicitation, investment portal

JEL Classification: K22

Suggested Citation

Oranburg, Seth, Securities Regulation and Social Media (March 4, 2020). Duquesne University School of Law Research Paper No. 2020-01, Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, Vol. 52, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3548312 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3548312

Seth Oranburg (Contact Author)

University of New Hampshire Franklin Pierce School of Law ( email )

Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
United States

Thomas R. Kline School of Law of Duquesne University ( email )

600 Forbes Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15282
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
135
Abstract Views
1,209
Rank
387,811
PlumX Metrics