A Presumption of Guilt: The Unlawful Enemy Combatant and the U.S. War on Terror

17 Pages Posted: 31 Mar 2020 Last revised: 15 Sep 2020

See all articles by Leila N. Sadat

Leila N. Sadat

Washington University in St. Louis - School of Law

Date Written: 2009

Abstract

This essay analyzes international human rights and humanitarian law as applicable to U.S. policies regarding "unlawful enemy combatants." It also examines unlawful enemy combatant cases thus far litigated in American courts. The essay concludes by observing how "Guantanamo rules" have been thoroughly integrated into the American legal system, and cautions against current proposals to "fix" Guantanamo Bay. It further provides seven solutions to repair U.S. legal policies regarding detainees and to strengthen America's human rights infrastructure.

Keywords: international human rights law, international humanitarian law, international law, unlawful enemy combatants, Guantanamo Bay, Bush Administration, Obama Administration, Geneva Conventions, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Afghanistan, Iraq, Taliban, al Qaeda, Abu Gharib

Suggested Citation

Sadat, Leila N., A Presumption of Guilt: The Unlawful Enemy Combatant and the U.S. War on Terror (2009). 37 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 539, 2009, Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 20.03.04, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3549566

Leila N. Sadat (Contact Author)

Washington University in St. Louis - School of Law ( email )

Campus Box 1120
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States
314-935-6411 (Phone)
314-935-5356 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
5
Abstract Views
65
PlumX Metrics