Preprints with The Lancet is part of SSRN´s First Look, a place where journals identify content of interest prior to publication. Authors have opted in at submission to The Lancet family of journals to post their preprints on Preprints with The Lancet. The usual SSRN checks and a Lancet-specific check for appropriateness and transparency have been applied. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. The findings should not be used for clinical or public health decision making and should not be presented to a lay audience without highlighting that they are preliminary and have not been peer-reviewed. For more information on this collaboration, see the comments published in The Lancet about the trial period, and our decision to make this a permanent offering, or visit The Lancet´s FAQ page, and for any feedback please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Geo-Temporal, Network Properties of the Chinese COVID-19 Epidemic
14 Pages Posted: 18 Mar 2020More...
Background: To control epidemics, decision-makers need information in real time and clinicians require data on locations more affected by mortality. To that end, an adaptation of Network Theory was applied to identify epidemic nodes, i.e., areas that included most fatalities per unit of time as well as explicit connections, such as highways.
Methods: Geo-temporal Chinese data on the COVID-19 epidemic were investigated with six (linear, logarithmic, power, growth, exponential, and logistic) regression models. A z-test compared the slopes observed.
Findings: This epidemic was located within a triple (road, railroad, and air) network of networks. Twenty provinces suspected to act as epidemic nodes were empirically investigated. Five provinces displayed four network properties (synchronicity, long-distance connections, directionality and assortativity), which helped discriminate epidemic nodes. The rank I node included most fatalities and was activated first. Later, rank II and III nodes reported fewer deaths, in that order. While the data from rank I-III nodes exhibited slopes, the data from the remaining provinces did not. The time series correlated with the mortality series. The power curve was the best fitting model for all slopes. Z-tests compared pairs (rank I vs. rank II, rank I vs. rank III, and rank II vs. rank III) of epidemic nodes, yielding z values ranging between 4.73 and 11.88. Because the z-critical value for alpha=0.001 in a two-tailed test was 3.30, all these comparisons were statistically significantly different. Therefore, rank I-III epidemic nodes – those reporting secondary deaths − were geo-temporally and statistically distinguishable.
Interpretation: The geo-temporal progression of epidemics – not where and when they start−seems to be highly structured. Epidemic network properties can detect and distinguish regions that differ in mortality. Because geo-referenced analyses can be conducted in less than ten minutes, they may provide real time information to both decision-makers and clinicians.
Funding Statement: FOF was funded through the support provided to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) – OSRO/GLO/507/USA on Global Health Security Agenda for the control of zoonosis in Africa.
Declaration of Interests: All authors declare no competing interests. ALR is a co-inventor of US patent 10,429,389 and European Union patent 2,959 295, which are not related to this topic.
Keywords: COVID-19; spatial epidemiology; smallworld; assortativity
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation