What’s the Added Value of Legalising City-zenship?

RSCAS 2020/16 - Cities vs States: Should Urban Citizenship be Emancipated from Nationality? - Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Global Governance Programme-386

10 Pages Posted: 6 Apr 2020

Date Written: December 6, 2019

Abstract

In his kick-off, Rainer Bauböck discusses the influence of citizenship, both urban and national, on the relationship between cities, states and the people that reside in them. His position is that urban citizenship should not, and cannot, replace national citizenship; rather, the future lies in an urban citizenship “derived from residence rather than nationality […] that complements national citizenship”. Bauböck believes that such a multilevel citizenship would be able to create a ‘status of equality’ shared by urban and non-urban populations. My response to Bauböck’s reflections on urban citizenship considers some legal implications of the postnational view that Bauböck finds most promising. Specifically, it questions how suited citizenship is – as a legal instrument – for accommodating the concerns raised in Bauböck’s contribution.

Keywords: citizenship, urban citizenship, legal implications

JEL Classification: K30

Suggested Citation

van Zeben, Josephine A. W., What’s the Added Value of Legalising City-zenship? (December 6, 2019). RSCAS 2020/16 - Cities vs States: Should Urban Citizenship be Emancipated from Nationality? - Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Global Governance Programme-386 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3552037

Josephine A. W. Van Zeben (Contact Author)

Wageningen University and Research ( email )

Hollandseweg 1
Wageningen, 6706KN
Netherlands

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
44
Abstract Views
226
PlumX Metrics