After Difference: A Meta-Comparative Study of Chinese Encounters with Foreign Comparative Law

36 Pages Posted: 12 Mar 2020 Last revised: 14 Mar 2020

See all articles by Samuli Seppänen

Samuli Seppänen

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) - Faculty of Law

Date Written: March 11, 2020

Abstract

Do comparatists based in “radically different” legal systems experience “radical difference” and its side effects—self-doubt, suspicion of cultural bias, and feelings of inadequacy—when they research American and European law? Focusing on Chinese comparative law, this Article argues that Chinese legal scholars’ attitudes to difference (and similarity) are best explained as reflections of these scholars’ ideological projects. Describing American and European legal systems in terms of similarity rather than difference supports Chinese law reformers’ efforts to advance and defend Western-style legal institutions in China. Conversely, conservative socialist and neoconservative Chinese scholars who resist Western-style legal and political reforms seek to emphasize cultural, social, and political differences between China and the West. Comparative law therefore allows legal scholars to relate to foreign law in various, ideologically meaningful ways. Statements about difference and similarity—and attitudes towards understanding, in general—should be understood in the light of such ideological projects.

Keywords: China, comparative law

Suggested Citation

Seppänen, Samuli, After Difference: A Meta-Comparative Study of Chinese Encounters with Foreign Comparative Law (March 11, 2020). The American Journal of Comparative Law , The Chinese University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2020-08, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3552473

Samuli Seppänen (Contact Author)

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) - Faculty of Law ( email )

6/F, Lee Shau Kee Building
Shatin, New Territories
Kowloon, Sha Tin
Hong Kong

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
105
Abstract Views
344
rank
307,221
PlumX Metrics