lancet-header
Preprints with The Lancet is part of SSRN´s First Look, a place where journals and other research experts identify content of interest prior to publication. These preprint papers are not peer-reviewed. Authors have either opted in at submission to The Lancet family of journals to post their preprints on Preprints with The Lancet, or submitted directly via SSRN. The usual SSRN checks and a Lancet-specific check for appropriateness and transparency have been applied. These papers should not be used for clinical decision making or reporting of research to a lay audience without indicating that this is preliminary research that has not been peer-reviewed. For more information see the Comment published in The Lancet, or visit The Lancet´s FAQ page, and for any feedback please contact preprints@lancet.com

Estimating COVID-19 Case Fatality Rate in the Middle of the Outbreak: Deadlier than Previously Estimated

19 Pages Posted: 30 Mar 2020

See all articles by Zhiqiang Wang

Zhiqiang Wang

Charles Darwin University - Menzies School of Health Research

Meina Liu

Harbin Medical University

More...

Abstract

Background: During the ongoing COVID-19 outbreak, the public are concerned about the case-fatality rate (CFR) of COVID-19. Previously reported CFR values vary widely from 0.4% to 15%. The method used in previous studies to estimate CFR during the epidemic is also questionable.

Methods: Data for this study were from the National Health Commission of China from mid-January until March 11, 2020 with 80,793 COVID-19 cases and 3,169 deaths. We applied the commonly used binomial probability method and a survival analysis method to estimate CFR values at different time points for China and China outside of Hubei.

Findings: Death rates decreased over time during the epidemic. By March 11, 2020, the COVID-19 death rate had dropped to 13.4 per 10,000 patient-days since diagnosis (95% CI: 12.9, 13.9) in China, and 2.6 per 10,000 patient-days (95% CI: 2.2, 3.2) in China outside of Hubei. The estimated CFR values using the commonly used binomial probability method were much lower than using the survival analysis method, particularly at early time of the epidemic. The survival analysis estimates decreased while the binomial probability estimates increased over time during the epidemic. By March 11, 2020, the binomial probability estimates had reached 3.9% (95% CI: 3.8, 4.1) for China and 0.87% (95% CI: 0.72, 1) for China outside of Hubei, still lower than the corresponding values estimated using the survival analysis method: 4.6% (95% CI: 4.4, 4.7) for China and 0.92% (95% CI: 0.76, 1.1) for China outside of Hubei.

Interpretation: During the epidemic of COVID-19, the previously used binomial probability method not only underestimates the CFR of COVID-19, but also leads to a false increasing trend over time. A survival analysis method is recommended for estimating CFR during the COVID-19 epidemic. The current CFR estimate for China including Hubei is 4.6%, about 5 times the value for China of outside Hubei (0.92%). There has been a CFR decreasing trend during the epidemic.

Funding Statement: This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81573255 to ML).

Declaration of Interests: None.

Keywords: COVID-19; Case fatality rate; novel coronavirus; SARS-CoV-2; Epidemic; Outbreak

Suggested Citation

Wang, Zhiqiang and Liu, Meina, Estimating COVID-19 Case Fatality Rate in the Middle of the Outbreak: Deadlier than Previously Estimated (3/12/2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3555242 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3555242

Zhiqiang Wang (Contact Author)

Charles Darwin University - Menzies School of Health Research ( email )

Darwin
Australia
+61 8 8946 8645 (Phone)

Meina Liu

Harbin Medical University ( email )

157 Baojian Rd
Nangang Qu
Haerbin Shi, Heilongjiang Sheng
China
+86 451 87502680 (Phone)

Click here to go to TheLancet.com

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
857
Downloads
118