Who Needs Legislators? Discrimination Against Sex Workers Is Sex Discrimination Under Title VII

34 Pages Posted: 15 Apr 2020 Last revised: 24 Apr 2020

Date Written: March 21, 2020

Abstract

Over the last several years, public discourse around sex work has dramatically increased. New York State and Washington, D.C. have both introduced legislation to decriminalize prostitution during the 2019 legislative sessions; the California public voted down Proposition 60 in 2016, which would have opened up egregious civil liability to adult film performers; and countless civil society organizations have recently, and publicly, committed to ending the human rights violations that those involved in the sex trade experience. Despite this attention towards legal reform, sex workers have—and will continue to— experience rampant discrimination in non-sex work employment. This Note argues that discrimination against sex workers is sex discrimination under Title VII. Specifically, because most sex workers are women, any policy of refusing to hire or retain sex workers will have a disparate impact based on sex and is, therefore, an impermissible employment practice under federal law.

Keywords: sex work, title VII, sex discrimination, disparate impact, anti-discrimination

Suggested Citation

Demeri, Derek, Who Needs Legislators? Discrimination Against Sex Workers Is Sex Discrimination Under Title VII (March 21, 2020). Rutgers Law Review, Vol. 72 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3558731

Derek Demeri (Contact Author)

Zeff Law Firm ( email )

100 Century Parkway, Suite 160
Mount Laurel, NJ NJ 08054
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
109
Abstract Views
794
rank
334,807
PlumX Metrics