Notice Pleading in Exile

24 Pages Posted: 16 Apr 2020 Last revised: 2 Jul 2024

See all articles by Adam Steinman

Adam Steinman

Texas A&M University School of Law

Date Written: March 23, 2020

Abstract

According to the conventional wisdom, the Supreme Court's 2009 decision in Ashcroft v. Iqbal discarded notice pleading in favor of plausibility pleading. This Article — part of a symposium commemorating the Iqbal decision's tenth anniversary — highlights decisions during those ten years that have continued to endorse notice pleading despite Iqbal. It also argues that those decisions reflect the best way to read the Iqbal decision. Although Iqbal is a troubling decision in many respects, it can be implemented consistently with the notice-pleading framework that the original drafters of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure had in mind.

Keywords: Iqbal, Twombly, Pleading, Notice Pleading, Plausibility Pleading, Civil Procedure, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

JEL Classification: K00, K10, K40, K41

Suggested Citation

Steinman, Adam, Notice Pleading in Exile (March 23, 2020). Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2020, pp. 1057-80, U of Alabama Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3559380, Texas A&M University School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3559380

Adam Steinman (Contact Author)

Texas A&M University School of Law ( email )

1515 Commerce St.
Fort Worth, TX Tarrant County 76102
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
145
Abstract Views
767
Rank
383,431
PlumX Metrics