Tort, Truth Recovery and the Northern Ireland Conflict

European Human Rights Law Review, 2020

31 Pages Posted: 22 Apr 2020 Last revised: 27 Apr 2020

See all articles by Conall Mallory

Conall Mallory

University of Northumbria at Newcastle

Sean Molloy

Newcastle University

C. R. G. Murray

Newcastle University - Newcastle Law School

Date Written: March 26, 2020

Abstract

Northern Ireland has no effective process to address legacy of the human tragedy of decades of conflict. And yet during that conflict, and especially in the years since the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement 1998, people have employed multiple legal mechanisms to gain information about events which affected them and their loved ones. Human rights challenges, public inquiries, freedom of information requests, police investigations and fresh inquests have all contributed to a patchwork of approaches to truth recovery. The UK Government has long viewed these efforts with suspicion; as the primary state actor involved in the conflict its records provide a much richer source of information about historic wrongs than the recollections of members of clandestine paramilitary organisations. Successive Conservative administrations have characterised many of these efforts as “lawfare”, intended to persecute veterans long after the events in question and undermine public faith in the UK’s Armed Forces. One under-explored element of this complex picture is use of tort in legacy cases. Civil actions, supported by legal aid funding in Northern Ireland, provide a potential avenue for the discovery of information held by public bodies. Even unsuccessful actions can thus contribute new information about the events in question. Many of the harms inflicted during the conflict were torts as well as crimes, and this article assesses the extent to which these civil actions provide an ersatz mechanism for truth recovery, and challenges efforts to curtail such actions as a “witch-hunt”.

Keywords: Northern Ireland Conflict, Truth and Reconciliation, Civil Liability, Disclosure, Limitation Periods, Closed Material Procedures, Human Rights

Suggested Citation

Mallory, Conall and Molloy, Sean and Murray, C. R. G., Tort, Truth Recovery and the Northern Ireland Conflict (March 26, 2020). European Human Rights Law Review, 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3562177 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3562177

Conall Mallory

University of Northumbria at Newcastle ( email )

Pandon Building
208, City Campus East-1
Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, Newcastle NE1 8ST
United Kingdom

Sean Molloy

Newcastle University ( email )

5 Barrack Road
Devonshire Building
NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE, NE1 7RU
United Kingdom

C. R. G. Murray (Contact Author)

Newcastle University - Newcastle Law School ( email )

Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.ncl.ac.uk/nuls/staff/profile/colin.murray

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
138
Abstract Views
811
rank
290,386
PlumX Metrics