Why is it so Difficult to Beat the Random Walk Rorecast of Exchange Rates?
56 Pages Posted: 27 Feb 2003
Date Written: November 2001
Abstract
We propose a nonlinear econometric model that can explain both the observed volatility and the persistence of real and nominal exchange rates. The model implies that near equilibrium, the nominal exchange rate will be well approximated by a random walk process. Large departures from fundamentals, in contrast, imply mean-reverting behavior toward fundamentals. Moreover, the predictability of the nominal exchange rate relative to the random walk benchmark tends to improve at longer horizons. We test the implications of the model and find strong evidence of exchange rate predictability at horizons of two to three years, but not at shorter horizons.
Keywords: Purchasing power parity; real exchange rate; random walk; economic models of exchange rate determination; long-horizon regression tests
JEL Classification: F31, F47, C53
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Tests of Equal Forecast Accuracy and Encompassing for Nested Models
-
Long Swings in the Exchange Rate: are They in the Data and Do Markets Know it?
-
Exchange Rates and Fundamentals
By Charles M. Engel and Kenneth D. West
-
Exchange Rates and Fundamentals
By Charles M. Engel and Kenneth D. West
-
Empirical Exchange Rate Models of the Nineties: Are Any Fit to Survive?
-
Exchange Rates and Monetary Fundamentals: What Do We Learn from Long-Horizon Regressions?
By Lutz Kilian
-
Empirical Exchange Rate Models of the Nineties: Are Any Fit to Survive?
By Yin-wong Cheung, Menzie David Chinn, ...