The Chinese Tradition of Administrative Law

Peter Cane, Herwig CH Hofmann, Eric Ip and Peter L Lindseth (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Administrative Law (Oxford University Press, Forthcoming)

University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2020/023

25 Pages Posted: 22 Apr 2020 Last revised: 21 May 2020

See all articles by Albert H. Y. Chen

Albert H. Y. Chen

The University of Hong Kong - Faculty of Law

Date Written: March 28, 2020

Abstract

For most of the time during the last two millennia, China was a dynastic empire ruled by an emperor with the assistance of a highly developed mandarinate of imperial organs. “Administrative law” in the modern sense of a set of legal norms enacted by the legislature or developed by the judiciary that simultaneously empower and constrain state organs and officials for the purpose of protecting the rights and liberties of subjects or citizens did not exist in traditional China. But there did exist for more than two millenniums elaborate and sophisticated rules regulating the powers and functions of each component of the highly complex and extensive machinery of imperial organs and officials, and prescribing in detail the duties of officials as well as the multiple and complicated monitoring, supervisory and disciplinary mechanisms applicable to the exercise of powers and performance of duties by officials in different state organs.

By the late 19th century, Qing China’s increasing subordination to Western imperialism and semi-colonialism convinced significant numbers of Chinese political and scholarly elite that there was a desperate need for China to “save” and strengthen itself by pursuing modernization. In the legal and political domains, this generally meant extensive borrowing or transplant of Western political and legal institutions. After China's defeat by Japan in the Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895, Japan’s experience of successful modernisation was widely admired by Chinese intellectuals, and the Japanese model was perceived as one that China should imitate in its self-strengthening efforts.

This essay will therefore begin with the introduction and reception of Japanese administrative law in China in the late Qing Dynasty. It will then survey the study of comparative law and the influence of foreign law on the development of Chinese administrative law in the Republic of China era (1911–1949) and after the establishment of the People's Republic of China (1949-). Major developments in Chinese administrative law in both the Republican era and the Communist era will also be briefly outlined as the context of administrative law scholarship. It will be seen that the story of the study of comparative and foreign administrative law in modern China is very closely intertwined with the story of the development of Chinese administrative law itself.

Keywords: China; administrative law; history; comparative law; Japan

Suggested Citation

Chen, Albert H. Y., The Chinese Tradition of Administrative Law (March 28, 2020). Peter Cane, Herwig CH Hofmann, Eric Ip and Peter L Lindseth (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Administrative Law (Oxford University Press, Forthcoming), University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2020/023, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3562981 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3562981

Albert H. Y. Chen (Contact Author)

The University of Hong Kong - Faculty of Law ( email )

Pokfulam Road
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
China

HOME PAGE: http://hub.hku.hk/rp/rp01240

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
80
Abstract Views
383
rank
339,016
PlumX Metrics