Political Budget Cycles Revisited: Testing the Signalling Process

36 Pages Posted: 28 Apr 2020

See all articles by Israel García

Israel García

University of Marburg

Bernd Hayo

University of Marburg - School of Business & Economics

Date Written: March 28, 2020

Abstract

A widespread view in the ‘political budget cycles’ literature is that incumbent politicians seek to influence voters’ perceptions of their competence and/or preferences by using the composition of the fiscal budget as a signalling tool. However, little is known about whether voters actually receive and perceive the signal in that way. To empirically assess the relevance of the signalling channel at the municipal level, we conducted a survey among 2,000 representative German citizens in 2018. Only a small fraction of voters feel well-informed about the fiscal budget signal and use the information it contains to decide whether to vote for the incumbent politician. Persons paying more attention to the signal sent by local politicians live in smaller municipalities, are more satisfied with their economic situation, are more educated, and do not feel that they are being electorally targeted. Our analysis suggests that the municipal voting decision, at least in Germany, is a more complex process than is commonly assumed in political budget cycle models.

Keywords: Political Budget Cycles, Signalling Mechanism, Local Government, Fiscal Policy, Representative Population Survey, Germany

JEL Classification: E62, D83, H70, H72

Suggested Citation

García, Israel and Hayo, Bernd, Political Budget Cycles Revisited: Testing the Signalling Process (March 28, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3567584 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3567584

Israel García

University of Marburg ( email )

Universitätsstrasse 24
D-35032 Marburg, D-35032
Germany

Bernd Hayo (Contact Author)

University of Marburg - School of Business & Economics ( email )

Universitaetsstr. 24
Marburg, D-35032
Germany
++49(0)6421-28-23091 (Phone)
++49(0)6421-28-23193 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
60
Abstract Views
532
Rank
647,973
PlumX Metrics