Evidence on the Decision Usefulness of Fair Values in Business Combinations

48 Pages Posted: 28 Apr 2020

See all articles by Justin Blann

Justin Blann

University of Arkansas

John L. Campbell

University of Georgia - J.M. Tull School of Accounting

Jonathan E. Shipman

University of Arkansas

Zac Wiebe

University of Arkansas - Sam M. Walton College of Business

Date Written: April 5, 2020

Abstract

In 2001, SFAS 141 (ASC 805) required that identifiable assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination be initially recorded at fair value rather than pre-acquisition book value. The FASB argued that fair value measurement would provide more decision-useful information about future cash flows following business combinations. However, opponents argued that fair values are often difficult to estimate and may be too noisy to be useful. In this study, we examine whether fair value measurement for identifiable assets and liabilities provides incremental decision-useful information about post-acquisition cash flows and offer two main findings. First, we find that fair values have incremental predictive ability for post-deal cash flows (beyond pooled book values), but only in limited circumstances: (i) horizontal (i.e., same-industry) deals, (ii) deals that do not involve R&D-intensive targets, and (iii) deals in which managers have less incentive to over-allocate purchase price to goodwill. This suggests that fair value measurement in business combinations only enhances decision usefulness in transactions when fair values are more reliably estimable and/or less subject to manager incentives. Second, we find that analysts update their cash flow forecasts to reflect the information provided by fair value disclosures, but only in transactions where we find that fair values are decision useful. Overall, our results suggest that there are limits in the extent to which fair value measurement for acquired identifiable assets and liabilities provides decision-useful information about future cash flows, and that capital market participants appear to recognize those limits as reflected in their decision making.

Keywords: Fair Value; Mergers and Acquisitions; Business Combinations; Cash Flows; Analyst Forecasts

JEL Classification: G34, M41

Suggested Citation

Blann, James and Campbell, John L. and Shipman, Jonathan E. and Wiebe, Zac, Evidence on the Decision Usefulness of Fair Values in Business Combinations (April 5, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3568820 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3568820

James Blann

University of Arkansas ( email )

Business Bldg. 454
Fayetteville, AR 72701
United States
8708142420 (Phone)

John L. Campbell (Contact Author)

University of Georgia - J.M. Tull School of Accounting ( email )

Athens, GA 30602
United States
706.542.3595 (Phone)
706.542.3630 (Fax)

Jonathan E. Shipman

University of Arkansas ( email )

Business Bldg. 454
Fayetteville, AR 72701
United States

Zac Wiebe

University of Arkansas - Sam M. Walton College of Business ( email )

Fayetteville, AR 72701
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
27
Abstract Views
167
PlumX Metrics